Sep 21, 2012

When Drowning Equals a Baby (and Pigs Fly)

In attempt to display what she believes to be the ludicrousness of the pro-life position, one Sabrina Duncan has put up this satirical petition on thepetitionsite.com:


Ban Floaties

Let’s re-write the petition to say what it implies:

We should ban [contraceptives, condoms, birth control] and other [such devices]. They only encourage risky behavior. The only 100% effective way to prevent [pregnancy] is total abstinence from [sexual intercourse]. And if you do by chance find yourself struggling with [an unplanned/unwanted pregnancy] then no [abortion or abortifacient drug] should be allowed to be administered. You got yourself into this mess, you have to live with the consequences. You should see [your baby] as a gift. Also if you were forcibly [raped], don’t worry. If it was a legitimate [rape] your body will [prevent conception from occurring].

Okay. Let’s work with this comparison. As Jennifer Fulwiler points out, “They just compared the birth of a baby to a horrible form of death.”  Life-ending or life-preventing drugs, devices, and procedures are compared to a life-saving safety device.  Pregnancy, giving birth, and babies themselves are compared to drowning (i.e., new life is as bad as death).  The only good comparison in this mess is matching sexual intercourse with water. I agree with this one, because water, like sex, is an incredible good, without which none of us would be here. Both are necessary for life, and can be sources of great beauty and wonder, and of great fun! If used improperly, both can be very dangerous. 

It is true that the only surefire way to avoid getting pregnant is to not have sex. Any other form of birth control or family planning has a fail rate, however small. That doesn’t mean it is not worth the risk to have sex.  Of course it is worth the risk! Swimming is fun, and I’m not going to let a small chance of drowning keep me from swimming. Similarly, people should have sex and have it often, but they should do so in a responsible manner. Just as you would not let children who don’t know how to swim play unsupervised in the water (even with a life jacket!), people who aren’t ready for sexual intercourse and everything that it entails should not have sex. Unless you can swim or are with someone who can, don’t fool around with water; don’t get in over your head. Likewise, unless you are ready to for your biological system to be filled with a cocktail of chemicals that bind you to your sexual partner, unless you can handle a faithful, permanent relationship that may result in new life (we call that marriage), don’t have sexual intercourse. 

There are rules, rules that exist for everyone’s wellbeing, governing when you can be in the ocean, where you can swim in a lake, what time of day you can visit the pool. If you want to swim, you must play by the rules. If you have your own, permanent pool, belonging to you alone, you have to be willing to accept the responsibilities that come with pool ownership.

Yet if you do break the rules, and find yourself drowning and in danger of death, any decent person would throw you a life jacket and do whatever is necessary to save your life, even if the procedures or drugs needed indirectly and foreseeably kill the child growing within you. However, direct abortion is never medically necessary, as noted by the International Symposium on Excellence in Maternal Healthcare. If your life is not in danger, carry the child to term, and put him or her up for adoption if you do not want the child. Sometimes life is difficult, inconvenient, full of unplanned events that may or may not be pleasant, and that may even put one’s health at risk. None of these things justify killing anyone who happens to inconvenience us, or make us uncomfortable, or otherwise bother us.

The last bit about cases of sexual assault, a parody of Missouri Congressman Todd Akin’s incorrect and unscientific statement about rape, represents the views of approximately no one. Rape is a tragic, traumatizing, horrible crime, and it can result in the victim becoming pregnant. But if someone intentionally hurts you, you are still not justified in later coming after them and killing your attacker. Much less would you be justified in taking the life of an innocent child, regardless of how tragic the circumstances of his or her conception. No matter what has been done to you, no one is ever justified in harming, or killing, another innocent human being. 

No comments:

Post a Comment